Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Volvo S90 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 - 4.0 | 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 219 - 326 HP | 180 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 315 - 512 NM | 260 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 9.4 seconds | 9 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 12.0 | 11.0 - 11.7 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S90, 5 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 2.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |