Jaguar XJ 1994 vs Chrysler Concorde 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Jaguar XJ is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chrysler Concorde is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler Concorde can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.2 - 4.0 | 3.3 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 219 - 326 HP | 163 - 218 HP | |
Torque: | 315 - 512 NM | 245 - 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 - 12.0 | 10.3 - 11.3 | |
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Concorde. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 5.15 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.43 m | |
Jaguar XJ is smaller. Jaguar XJ is 13 cm shorter than the Chrysler Concorde, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 473 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`500 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Chrysler Concorde has
| |