Jaguar XJ 1997 vs Kia Magentis 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Kia Magentis has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive, while Kia Magentis can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.2 - 4.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 370 HP | 136 - 168 HP | |
| Torque: | 316 - 525 NM | 184 - 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 - 8.5 seconds | 8.5 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 - 13.1 | 9.1 - 10.9 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Magentis. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.41 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 30 cm longer than the Kia Magentis, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.5 metres more than that of the Kia Magentis, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 1`993 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Kia Magentis has
| |