Jaguar XJ 1997 vs Kia Clarus 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Jaguar XJ
1997 - 2003
Kia Clarus
1996 - 1999
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Kia Clarus has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive, while Kia Clarus can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 3.2 - 4.01.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 240 - 370 HP116 - 133 HP
Torque: 316 - 525 NM152 - 171 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.6 - 8.5 seconds10.7 - 13.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.9 - 13.19.3 - 12.0
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Clarus.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 5.02 m4.70 m
Width: 1.80 m1.77 m
Height: 1.31 m1.42 m
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower.
Jaguar XJ is 32 cm longer than the Kia Clarus, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data764 litres
Turning diameter: 12.1 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.5 metres more than that of the Kia Clarus, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`900~ 1`760
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 7400no data
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XJ has
  • automatic transmission only
Kia Clarus has
  • both manual and automatic
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv