Jaguar XJ 1997 vs Kia Clarus 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Kia Clarus has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive, while Kia Clarus can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.2 - 4.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 240 - 370 HP | 116 - 133 HP | |
Torque: | 316 - 525 NM | 152 - 171 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 - 8.5 seconds | 10.7 - 13.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 - 13.1 | 9.3 - 12.0 | |
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Clarus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.31 m | 1.42 m | |
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 32 cm longer than the Kia Clarus, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 764 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.5 metres more than that of the Kia Clarus, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 1`760 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Kia Clarus has
| |