Jaguar XJ 1997 vs Jaguar S-Type 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jaguar S-Type has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available only with rear wheel drive, while Jaguar S-Type can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.2 - 4.0 | 2.5 - 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 370 HP | 201 - 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 316 - 525 NM | 250 - 541 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 - 8.5 seconds | 5.6 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 - 13.1 | 9.5 - 12.5 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar S-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.45 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 14 cm longer than the Jaguar S-Type, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jaguar S-Type, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 2`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar S-Type has
| |