Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Jaguar XJ 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XJ 2003 is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jaguar XJ 1994 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.2 (petrol, diesel) | 3.2 - 4.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 400 HP | 219 - 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 553 NM | 315 - 512 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 8.2 seconds | 6.3 - 9.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 12.3 | 10.6 - 12.0 | |
|
Jaguar XJ 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XJ 1994. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ 2003 is larger. Jaguar XJ 2003 is 7 cm longer than the Jaguar XJ 1994, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ 2003 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ 2003 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ 1994, which means Jaguar XJ 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |