Jaguar XJ 2003 vs Jaguar S-Type 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jaguar S-Type has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 4.2 | 2.5 - 4.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 400 HP | 201 - 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 553 NM | 250 - 541 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 8.2 seconds | 5.6 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 12.3 | 7.1 - 12.4 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar S-Type. On average, Jaguar XJ equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar S-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 21 cm longer than the Jaguar S-Type, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJ has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJ has 70 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar S-Type. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jaguar S-Type. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar S-Type has
| |