Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo V40 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo V40 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 625 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 12.1 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Jaguar XJ equipped with diesel engines consume 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 81 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 335 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJ has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJ has 185 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`346 | ~ 1`976 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |