Jaguar XJ 2009 vs BMW 7 series 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available only with rear wheel drive, while BMW 7 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 258 - 544 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 625 NM | 310 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | 4.6 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 12.1 | 5.6 - 12.9 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 7 series. On average, Jaguar XJ equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 7 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XJ is 5 cm longer than the BMW 7 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XJ is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 500 litres | |
| Jaguar XJ has 20 litres more trunk space than the BMW 7 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 7 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`346 | ~ 2`584 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 7 sērija has
| |