Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Passat CC has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available only with rear wheel drive, while Volkswagen Passat CC can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 1.8 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 152 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 625 NM | 250 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | 5.5 - 8.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 12.1 | 5.5 - 9.3 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat CC. On average, Jaguar XJ equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 532 litres | |
| Jaguar XJ has 12 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`346 | ~ 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |