Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Lexus ES 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive, while Lexus ES can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 2.5 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 161 - 277 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 625 NM | 213 - 346 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | 7.4 - 9.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 12.1 | 5.4 - 9.5 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus ES. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XJ is 28 cm longer than the Lexus ES, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Jaguar XJ has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJ has 60 litres more trunk space than the Lexus ES. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.3 metres more than that of the Lexus ES, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`346 | ~ 2`127 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Lexus ES has
| |