Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Jaguar XF 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 238 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 625 NM | 293 - 625 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 12.1 | 6.8 - 12.5 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XF. On average, Jaguar XJ equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.18 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
| Jaguar XJ is 22 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 500 litres | |
| Jaguar XJ has 20 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.48 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.22 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`346 | ~ 2`291 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |