Jaguar XJ 2009 vs Hyundai Equus 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | 3.8 - 5.0 (petrol) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Jaguar XJ is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 334 - 430 HP | |
Torque: | 340 - 625 NM | 395 - 510 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.5 seconds | 5.8 - 6.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 12.1 | 10.9 - 12.3 | |
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Equus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.18 m | 5.16 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
Jaguar XJ is larger, but lower. Jaguar XJ is 2 cm longer than the Hyundai Equus, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XJ is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 474 litres | |
Jaguar XJ has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XJ has 46 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Equus. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 1.2 metres more than that of the Hyundai Equus, which means Jaguar XJ can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`346 | ~ 2`465 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 14 200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Hyundai Equus has
| |