Jaguar XJ 2015 vs BMW 7 series 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. BMW 7 series is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 258 - 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 700 NM | 400 - 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.9 seconds | 4.4 - 6.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 11.1 | 4.9 - 8.5 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 7 series. On average, Jaguar XJ equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 7 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XJ is 4 cm longer than the BMW 7 series, width is practically the same , while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 515 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`528 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 800 | 39 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
BMW 7 sērija has
| |