Jaguar XJ 2015 vs Volvo S90 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XJ is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo S90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jaguar XJ is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar XJ also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Volvo S90 is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 - 510 HP | 150 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 700 NM | 300 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.9 seconds | 5.1 - 9.9 seconds | |
| In general, Jaguar XJ are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volvo S90. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 11.1 | 1.9 - 7.6 | |
|
Jaguar XJ petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S90. On average, Jaguar XJ equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Jaguar XJ is larger. Jaguar XJ is 23 cm longer than the Volvo S90, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XJ is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 250 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XJ is 237.1 metres less than that of the Volvo S90, which means Jaguar XJ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`433 kg | ~ 2`393 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`831 kg | ~ 1`892 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 602 kg | ~ 501 kg | |
| Jaguar XJ load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Volvo S90. Therefore, Jaguar XJ is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XJ has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |