Jaguar XF 2020 vs Audi A6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 41 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.5 | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 716 litres | 565 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1695 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Audi A6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`330 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 25 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |