Jaguar XF 2020 vs Audi A6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 15 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 6.9 | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 459 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1484 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Jaguar XF has 71 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`240 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 29 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi A6 has
| |