Jaguar XF 2015 vs Audi A6 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 55 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 200 NM more than Audi A6. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.0 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 4 cm longer than the Audi A6, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 530 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XF scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |