Jaguar XF 2019 vs Lexus GS 2016
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Jaguar XF) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Lexus GS) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 300 HP | 296 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 352 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 4 HP more power than Lexus GS, whereas torque is 348 NM more than Lexus GS. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 11.40 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Lexus GS can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Lexus GS version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.88 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
885 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.7 metres more than that of the Lexus GS, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`390 kg | 2`305 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`803 kg | 1`860 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 587 kg | 445 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Lexus GS. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Lexus GS has
| |