Jaguar XF 2012 vs Citroen C5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 4 HP less power than Citroen C5, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Citroen C5) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 18 cm longer than the Citroen C5, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 439 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 101 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres less than that of the Citroen C5. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`320 kg | 2`231 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`735 kg | 1`731 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 585 kg | 500 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Citroen C5. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Citroen C5 has
| |