Jaguar XF 2012 vs Audi A6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 64 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.8 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1550 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 3 cm longer than the Audi A6, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 546 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`320 kg | 2`155 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |