Jaguar XF 2012 vs Audi A6 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 275 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 601 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 71 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 201 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.97 m | 4.94 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.53 m | |
Jaguar XF is 3 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XF is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 549 litres | 565 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 16 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`505 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 10 400 | 12 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |