Jaguar XF 2012 vs Mercedes E class 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 275 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 601 NM | 540 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 44 HP more power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 61 NM more than Mercedes E class. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes E class. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.97 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 7 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 549 litres | 695 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 146 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes E class. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`565 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 10 400 | 8800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |