Jaguar XF 2012 vs Volvo XC70 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 37 HP more power than Volvo XC70, but torque is 151 NM less than Volvo XC70. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but lower. Jaguar XF is 13 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 549 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 26 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 2`330 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |