Jaguar XF 2012 vs BMW 5 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 57 HP more power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 111 NM less than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 549 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1670 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 11 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |