Jaguar XF 2012 vs Mercedes E class 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 249 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 4 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 251 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes E klase 2013 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.51 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 549 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1950 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`390 kg | 2`550 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 10 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |