Jaguar XF 2012 vs Volvo XC70 2011

 
Jaguar XF
2012 - 2015
Volvo XC70
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 190 HP163 HP
Torque: 450 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds10.2 seconds
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive.
Jaguar XF engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo XC70, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo XC70. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.16.4
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km7.9 l/100km
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ...  More about Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.97 m4.84 m
Width: 1.88 m1.86 m
Height: 1.48 m1.60 m
Jaguar XF is larger, but lower.
Jaguar XF is 13 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 549 litres575 litres
Volvo XC70 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 26 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC70. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data11.5 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`3902`330
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 10 4009200
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XF has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo XC70 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv