Jaguar XF 2012 vs BMW 5 series 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 47 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 90 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Jaguar XF 2012 2.2 engine BMW 5 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.97 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 549 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1670 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 11 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`390 | 2`380 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |