Jaguar XF 2012 vs BMW 5 series 2013

 
Jaguar XF
2012 - 2015
BMW 5 series
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 190 HP143 HP
Torque: 450 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds10 seconds
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive.
Jaguar XF engine produces 47 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 90 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.14.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km330'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years17 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Range Rover EvoqueInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.97 m4.91 m
Width: 1.88 m1.86 m
Height: 1.48 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 549 litres560 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1670 litres
Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 11 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data12 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`3902`380
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 11 20016 800
Pros and Cons: Jaguar XF has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv