Jaguar XF 2015 vs Mazda 6 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 380 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 230 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 240 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 6.1 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda 6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda 6 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 15 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 438 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 102 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |