Jaguar XF 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2008
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 55 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 11.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | Used also on Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC60 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but lower. Jaguar XF is 32 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |