Jaguar XF 2015 vs Audi A6 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 40 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 74 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar XF engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar F-Pace, Jaguar XE | Used also on Audi A7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi A6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi A6 2011 3.0 engine: The primary issue with all engines in this series is excessive oil consumption. This is often caused by scoring in the cylinders due to catalytic converter debris entering the combustion chambers.
Another ... More about Audi A6 2011 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 4 cm longer than the Audi A6, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 530 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XF scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |