Jaguar XF 2015 vs Ford Mondeo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF and Ford Mondeo have the same engine power, but Jaguar XF torque is 30 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.2 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1340 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1460 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | 128 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Mondeo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 8 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 14 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 429 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 111 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`320 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`696 kg | 1`589 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 614 kg | 731 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Ford Mondeo. Therefore, Ford Mondeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XF scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |