Jaguar XF 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 5 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but lower. Jaguar XF is 32 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |