Jaguar XF 2015 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.4 | |
| Jaguar XF consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1530 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1730 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 15 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 481 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 59 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`250 kg | 2`005 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |