Jaguar XF 2015 vs Ford Mondeo 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1530 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1730 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | 128 mm (5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Mondeo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford Mondeo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from three 4x4 versions of Ford Mondeo 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 8 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 14 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 429 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 111 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`250 kg | 2`260 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`659 kg | 1`524 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 591 kg | 736 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem less than Ford Mondeo. Therefore, Ford Mondeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XF scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |