Jaguar XF 2015 vs BMW 5 series 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 4 HP less power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 50 NM more than BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 8.1 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine BMW 5 sērija 2010 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 6 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 13 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 520 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 20 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`235 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The BMW 5 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |