Jaguar XF 2015 vs BMW 5 series 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 30 NM more than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1530 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| 1730 km on highway | 1650 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1090 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | 139 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 5 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW X3, BMW 6 sērija, BMW X4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine BMW 5 sērija 2020 2.0 engine: A fairly reliable engine with a long service life. On the whole, the chains are more reliable than in the BMW N-series engines, but they also have a tendency to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs to be ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2020 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Jaguar XF and BMW 5 series are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`250 kg | 2`405 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`659 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 591 kg | 670 kg | |
| Jaguar XF load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than BMW 5 series. Therefore, BMW 5 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 41 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |