Jaguar XF 2015 vs BMW 5 series 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW 5 series, but torque is 30 NM more than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine BMW 5 sērija 2016 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 2 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 12 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 530 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 10 litres more trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.05 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.45 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`245 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XF scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 29 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |