Jaguar XF 2015 vs Audi A6 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 3 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1530 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1730 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 4 cm longer than the Audi A6, 11 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`250 kg | 2`165 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XF scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |