Jaguar XF 2015 vs Volvo S90 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo S90, but torque is 30 NM more than Volvo S90. Despite less power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Jaguar XF is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 11 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 461 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar XF has 79 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S90. The Volvo S90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 250 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 238.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S90, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 38 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |