Jaguar XF 2015 vs Volvo S90 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 55 HP less power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60, Volvo V90, Volvo V90 Cross Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jaguar XF engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Jaguar XF and Volvo S90 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 250 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 238.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S90, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo S90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |