Jaguar XF 2015 vs Volvo S90 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 140 HP less power than Volvo S90, but torque is 30 NM more than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 7.3 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Jaguar XF and Volvo S90 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 40 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S90, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Volvo S90 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 000 | 25 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |