Jaguar XF 2015 vs Skoda Superb 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Superb) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 9 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 12 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 625 litres | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jaguar XF has 85 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Jaguar XF uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XF scores higher in safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |