Jaguar XF 2015 vs Kia Stinger 2017
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Kia Stinger is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 20 HP less power than Kia Stinger, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Kia Stinger. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jaguar XF consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Stinger, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jaguar XF consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Stinger. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Stinger engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger. Jaguar XF is 12 cm longer than the Kia Stinger, 12 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1114 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 134 litres more trunk space than the Kia Stinger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.4 metres more than that of the Kia Stinger, which means Jaguar XF can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Kia Stinger has
| |