Jaguar XF 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 37 HP more power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volvo XC60. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.5 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC60 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XF might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but lower. Jaguar XF is 32 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 10 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |