Jaguar XF 2012 vs Ford Mondeo 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 180 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 210 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 6.3 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 9 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 429 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 111 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`315 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Mondeo is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |