Jaguar XF 2011 vs Volvo S80 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is more dynamic to drive. Jaguar XF engine produces 54 HP more power than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.9 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S80) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Jaguar XF is larger, but slightly lower. Jaguar XF is 11 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo S80. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |