Jaguar XF 2011 vs Ford Mondeo 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 249 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford Mondeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 8.1 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 9 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Jaguar XF is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 429 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Jaguar XF has 111 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Mondeo is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar XF scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |