Jaguar XF 2011 vs Chrysler 300C 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 239 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300C is a more dynamic driving. Jaguar XF engine produces 49 HP less power than Chrysler 300C. Due to the lower power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 9.5 | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jaguar XF consumes 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C, which means that by driving the Jaguar XF over 15,000 km in a year you can save 615 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar XF gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 5.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 8 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jaguar XF is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 462 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 465 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jaguar XF has 78 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 300C. The Chrysler 300C may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`472 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |