Jaguar XF 2011 vs Audi A6 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Jaguar XF engine produces 13 HP more power than Audi A6. Despite the higher power, Jaguar XF reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jaguar XF could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jaguar XF consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XF) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jaguar XF is 5 cm longer than the Audi A6, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 530 litres | |
| Jaguar XF has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jaguar XF is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Jaguar XF can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`165 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi A6 scores higher in safety tests. The Audi A6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jaguar XF has
|
Audi A6 has
| |